Did this ("may even be faster") turn out to be true?
Otis
----- Original Message ----
> From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 9, 2008 11:07:29 AM
> Subject: Re: replace stax API with Geronimo-stax+Woodstox
>
> FYI, I'm testing Solr with woodstox now and will probably do some ad
> hoc stress testing too.
> But woodstox is a quality parser. I expect less problems then we had
> with the reference implementation (and it may even be faster too)
>
> -Yonik
