Great, I've subscribed to that list too! I'll soon be adding some Jira
tickets. Thanks Erik,

Matt

On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Matt - that's the right approach indeed!   Patches with test cases are the
> best, but any patch or even an idea for improvement is worth creating JIRA
> issues for.
>
> Also, we have a list specifically for the Rubyists among us at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (use -subscribe to sign up), and we can use
> that list for more detailed discussions.
>
> Looking forward to your contributions!
>
>        Erik
>
>
> On Sep 13, 2008, at 8:44 AM, Matt Mitchell wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> I've been using Solr for some time now and made good use of the solr-ruby
>> library. Currently, I'm using it to power a modified version of Flare in a
>> project called Blacklight: http://blacklight.rubyforge.org/ - an open
>> source
>> library catalog front-end.
>>
>> This modified Flare is using an unmodified version of solr-ruby 0.6.0, but
>> I'm always so tempted to change things in the solr-ruby library to make
>> things easier better in Flare. So I've got some ideas on how it may be
>> improved upon. The issues I have with solr-ruby are related mainly to
>> syntactical/api things. But there are internal issues as well, like the
>> way
>> solr-ruby handles creating response objects and the lack of attr readers
>> in
>> the response documents. Last and certainly not least, I feel that the
>> library could benefit from a good cleanup and simplification. So my plan
>> is
>> to head on over to the issue tracker and start plugin in some tickets. Is
>> this the right approach here? Does anyone else have similar ideas or
>> thoughts on how solr-ruby could be improved upon?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>
>

Reply via email to