. Is it a strong requirment to have apache in the logo?. I didn't know that


On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Lukáš Vlček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am glad you like the draft#1 (and actually I think the second design is
> not totally lost, just wipe out the Apache letters and you get it). But the
> problem is that the draft#1 (as it is today) would not make it into the
> contest due to violation of the strongest requirement:
>
> The logo must incorporate the full project name: Apache Solr
>
> That is the assigment (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LogoContest).
> You can try to push the contest organizers, not me...
>
> If you were to ask me if I like the fact that the Apache word has to be
> incorporated then I would tell you that I not happy about it (but this
> should not mean that I think that one can not create a perfect design with
> the Apache word). The problem I see with this is that there are no official
> rules how the Apache word can be used in designs (which type of font, which
> color...). Current mix of fonts in my second proposal is not ideal but I am
> scared to use any exotic font on Apache because people are used to see
> something like Arial Bold and in the end of the day having too exotic design
> of Apache could be seen as an disadvantage.
>
> Regards,
> Lukas
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Adding apache just adds to the no:of letters . So the logo was a bit
>> big.  draft1 is cool
>> --Noble
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I think what Noble meant to say is that the Apache lying below Solr does
>> not
>> > looking very good. Perhaps we can shift Apache either left or upwards of
>> > Solr?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Lukáš Vlček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> It seems so, according to official requiremetns:
>> >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LogoContest
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > do we really need the APACHE under the solr logo? the other one looks
>> >> clean
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Lukas Vlcek (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >     [
>> >> >
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-84?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>> >> ]
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Lukas Vlcek updated SOLR-84:
>> >> > > ----------------------------
>> >> > >
>> >> > >    Attachment: solr_logo_it_is_burning.png
>> >> > >
>> >> > > It is burning! ... Apache Solr Logo contest submition (based on my
>> >> > previous draft http://picasaweb.google.cz/lukas.vlcek/Solr)
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> New Solr logo?
>> >> > >> --------------
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>                 Key: SOLR-84
>> >> > >>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-84
>> >> > >>             Project: Solr
>> >> > >>          Issue Type: Improvement
>> >> > >>            Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
>> >> > >>            Priority: Minor
>> >> > >>         Attachments: logo-grid.jpg, logo-solr-d.jpg,
>> logo-solr-e.jpg,
>> >> > logo-solr-source-files-take2.zip, solr-84-source-files.zip,
>> solr-f.jpg,
>> >> > solr-logo-20061214.jpg, solr-logo-20061218.JPG,
>> solr-logo-20070124.JPG,
>> >> > solr-nick.gif, solr.jpg, solr.s1.jpg, solr.svg,
>> >> solr_logo_it_is_burning.png,
>> >> > sslogo-solr-flare.jpg, sslogo-solr.jpg, sslogo-solr2-flare.jpg,
>> >> > sslogo-solr2.jpg, sslogo-solr3.jpg
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Following up on SOLR-76, our trainee Nicolas Barbay (nicolas (put
>> at
>> >> > here) sarraux-dessous.ch) has reworked his logo proposal to be more
>> >> "solar".
>> >> > >> This can either be the start of a logo contest, or if people like
>> it
>> >> we
>> >> > could adopt it. The gradients can make it a bit hard to integrate, not
>> >> sure
>> >> > if this is really a problem.
>> >> > >> WDYT?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> >> > > -
>> >> > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > --Noble Paul
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> http://blog.lukas-vlcek.com/
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --Noble Paul
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://blog.lukas-vlcek.com/
>



-- 
--Noble Paul

Reply via email to