[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12647004#action_12647004
]
Gunnar Wagenknecht commented on SOLR-851:
-----------------------------------------
{blockquote}
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: Dependency on StAX Utils
Datum: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:42:04 +0530
Von: Shalin Shekhar Mangar <...>
Antwort an: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
An: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Referenzen: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for pointing this out.
I just removed stax-utils from my local trunk, changed all instances of
BaseXMLInputFactory.newInstance() to XMLInputFactory.newInstance() and ran
test. All tests pass so I think we should be able to remove this jar from
our list of dependencies.
[...]
Please raise an issue in jira for this.
{blockquote}
> Remove dependency on StAX Utils or make it optional
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-851
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-851
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Wish
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Gunnar Wagenknecht
>
> I found out that the dependency on https://stax-utils.dev.java.net/ comes
> down to two places where BaseXMLInputFactory.newInstance() is called.
> Is that intentionally or can those be replaced with
> XMLInputFactory.newInstance()?
> The method newInstance is not defined in BaseXMLInputFactory but in
> XMLInputFactory which comes from the JDK in Java 6. I don't know about Java
> 5, though.
> If it's because of Java 5 can I prepare a patch for using reflection to make
> the dependency on StAX Utils optional? The reason I'm asking is because I'm
> about to submit Solr 1.3 for IP review to the Eclipse Foundation because I
> want to use it in our Eclipse project. Lesser dependencies would make it
> easier.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
