[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12647797#action_12647797
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-856:
---------------------------------
bq.I'd rather see this implemented as a separate filter, and not blending this
in with SolrDispatchFilter.
I considered that option too. But , it means users editing web.xml (which is
not a good idea). Then the extra filter means more overhead. I guess we should
not do that.
bq.Isn't this usually handled as a configuration of the Container rather than
at the servlet level?
I would love to hear that? Bbut can we rely on that and expect that all
containers will have this .Consider the fact that a feature relies on this
(SOLR-829) for a critical functionality
> Suport for "Accept-Encoding : gzip" in SolrDispatchFilter
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-856
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-856
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Attachments: SOLR-856.patch
>
>
> If the client sends an Accept-Encoding : gzip header then SolrDispatchFilter
> should respect that and send back data as zipped
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
