[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-829:
---------------------------------------

    Attachment: solr-829.patch

Changes:
# Fixes a possible connection leak in FileFetcher#getStream method.
# A single HttpClient is created with MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager in 
SnapPuller and is re-used for every operation
# Idle connections are closed in SnapPull#destroy method
# Release connection and stream closing is not done in a separate thread anymore
# ReplicationHandler does a snappull command in a new thread so that an API 
call for this command is not kept waiting until the operation completes. The 
admin jsp which used to make a call to this method in another thread is also 
changed to remove the thread creation.

I'll commit this in a day or two if there are no problems.

> replication Compression
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-829
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-829
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: replication (java)
>            Reporter: Simon Collins
>            Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>         Attachments: email discussion.txt, solr-829.patch, solr-829.patch, 
> solr-829.patch, solr-829.patch
>
>
> From a discussion on the mailing list solr-user, it would be useful to have 
> an option to compress the files sent between servers for replication purposes.
> Files sent across between indexes can be compressed by a large margin 
> allowing for easier replication between sites.
> ...Noted by Noble Paul 
> we will use a gzip on both ends of the pipe . On the slave side you can say 
> <str name="zip">true<str> as an extra option to compress and send data from 
> server 
> Other thoughts on issue: 
> Do keep in mind that compression is a CPU intensive process so it is a trade 
> off between CPU utilization and network bandwidth.  I have see cases where 
> compressing the data before a network transfer ended up being slower than 
> without compression because the cost of compression and un-compression was 
> more than the gain in network transfer.
> Why invent something when compression is standard in HTTP? --wunder

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to