OK . Could you guys give some quick feedback on SOLR-828 and SOLR-810 If I get early feedback I may be able to avoid rewrites.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK . So , I'll stick to JDBC. Derby looks like the best bet > > If we must ship it along w/ Solr it is another 2.6MB jar (embdded > version) with the distro. > > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Jason Rutherglen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's mostly dead and synchronizes on reads and writes. >> >> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > Please consider using JDBM, now in the Apache incubator, >>> >>> It doesn't look like it's in the incubator yet... there was interest, >>> but a proposal was never put on the wiki. >>> >>> > but with a long >>> > history at SF.net and wide usage. Its API is essentially the same as BDB. >>> >>> You wouldn't be able to tell by the SourceForge page - it has the look >>> of a dead project. >>> >>> -Yonik >>> >> > > > > -- > --Noble Paul > -- --Noble Paul
