: right, but what should be the role of committers voting in the second round? : Is it: : : 1. Rank the entries the committers like best : or : 2. Rank the entries the committers think best represent the community : preferences. : : My understanding of the purpose of the second round is to interpret the : results of the community poll and cast a binding VOTE. I think we should
committers should cast their votes as they feel appropriate to best serve the interests of the community -- it's not really different then voting on an implementation approach for a feature, or what logging framework to use, or a decisison to switch from java 1.5 to 1.6 ... we have to make a subjective decision based on the feedback we've observed from the community as a whole (with solr-logo-results.html serving as our cliff notes) -Hoss
