On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:39 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: If I knew you had the day off, I would ask about moving to jdk 1.6!
Ryan: I may not know where you live, and i may not know what you look
like, but if you insist on goading me like this i will dedicate
myself to
answering those questions so i can come to your house and hurt you.
game on!
: > I feel dirty just thinking about this.
:
: I'm afraid so, but I'll describe it differently so it does not
sound as crazy.
No, no ... you missunderstood. It didn't actually sound crazy to me,
that's why i felt dirty.
here's my question though: if the slf4j guys have such great support
for
implementing the commons-logging api (jcl-over-slf4j.jar right?)
then why
do we need to change any code in solr?
using your three bullet points: can't we skip #1, and just do #2
and then #3 still applies?
I'm not sure I follow... To be clear, the behavior in either case
will be the same. The question is just about what logging
dependencies are required for solr. Since we are forced to depend on
the commons-logging api, it might make sense to just use that api.
I am totally happy to leave things as they are -- I like the slf4j API
and it seems to be getting more popular. (lucene java is even
considering using it)
We can make this thread go away by not replying :)
ryan
