Great! We should try to have a release ASAP because we already have a critical mass of features.A release in January should be a good milestone.
The official release is very important for a lot of users because their organizations have a such a policy. We can freeze on a list of bugs and can start focusing on cleaning them up. If Lucene is planning to have a release we can try to synchronize with that --Noble On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to suggest we start thinking about 1.4 being released in early > January. Here's my reasoning: > > 1. I think we all agree that 1.2 -> 1.3 was way too long > 2. Quarterly releases seem to be a pretty nice timeframe for people such > that you aren't constantly upgrading, yet you don't have to wait for > eternity for new features > 3. And here's where the rubber meets the road: We've actually put in some > significant features and bug fixes, namely Java-based Replication, Tika > Integration, new more scalable faceting implementation and on and on, not to > mention Lucene improvements and other bug fixes. Read about it at > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/CHANGES.txt > > Here's what's currently targeted to 1.4: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310230&fixfor=12313351 > > Since I so enjoyed doing the release last time, I volunteer to do it again > this time. > > Thoughts? > > -Grant > -- --Noble Paul
