[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12657757#action_12657757 ]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-793: --------------------------------- The XML API looks a bit ugly. Why do we need to add this like this <add commitWithin="6"> One update request will have only one <add> . So it could have very well been added to the request params like waitFlush and waitSearcher. If at all it has to be kept in the xml it should be on a per document . The SolrInputDocument can have a 'commitWithin' attribute. > set a commit time bounds in the <add> command > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-793 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-793 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: update > Reporter: Ryan McKinley > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.4 > > Attachments: SOLR-793-commitWithin.patch, > SOLR-793-commitWithin.patch, SOLR-793-deadlock.patch > > > Currently there are two options for how to handle commiting documents: > 1. the client explicitly starts the commit via <commit/> > 2. set an auto commit value on the server -- clients can assume all documents > will be commited within that time. > However, this does not help in the case where the clients know what documents > need updating quickly and others that could wait. I suggest adding: > {code:xml} > <add commitWithin="100">... > {/code:xml} > to the update syntax so the client can schedule commits explicitly. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.