Perfect . That is what I had in mind. thanks On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> What about just removing the offending "if(handlerName == null) return >>> null;" >>> That should give us acceptable back compatibility since "" and null >>> were always meant to be the default. > >> That means normalize() would return "" for null? > > Yes, as it does right now... it doesn't seem like any other changes > are needed except removing the "if(handlerName == null) return null;" > > -Yonik >
-- --Noble Paul
