The same test w/ XML format has no such problem. But with binary
update format it is throwing error

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
<[email protected]> wrote:
> This is a JUnit test (which patch in the JIRA).
>
> I am not doing anything other than  the LargeVolumeJettyTest .
> --Noble
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Doesn't that mean that you are doing something that causes searchers to warm 
>> up (e.g. running snap* scripts or your new replication equivalent) and doing 
>> that so frequently that when you do this for the third time the first two 
>> searchers are still warming up?
>>
>>
>> Otis
>> --
>> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Monday, January 5, 2009 11:10:06 PM
>>> Subject: error: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearcher
>>>
>>> I have implemented the javabin update functionality (SOLR-8965) and
>>> the LargeVolumeJettytestcase is failing with the following message.
>>>
>>>
>>> exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2, try again later.
>>> Jan 5, 2009 5:44:40 PM
>>> org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor finish
>>> INFO: {} 0 15
>>> Jan 5, 2009 5:44:40 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
>>> SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new
>>> searcher. exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2, try again later.
>>>     at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.getSearcher(SolrCore.java:1050)
>>>     at
>>> org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2.commit(DirectUpdateHandler2.java:350)
>>>     at
>>> org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProcessor.processCommit(RunUpdateProcessorFactory.java:78)
>>>     at
>>> org.apache.solr.handler.BinaryUpdateRequestHandler.parseAndLoadDocs(BinaryUpdateRequestHandler.java:95)
>>>
>>> Can anyone point me to what I may be doing wrong?
>>> --
>>> --Noble Paul
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --Noble Paul
>



-- 
--Noble Paul

Reply via email to