[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12677454#action_12677454
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-764:
-----------------------------------
"lex" originally made sense to me because it is index order, which is
lexicographic for the indexed tokens (but not for the human-readable values).
So an "integer" field will sort the terms as 0,100,2
while an "sint" field will show 0,2,100
It's not as simple to just "do the right thing" since it would carry a
significant performance penalty (and that's something we shouldn't cover up or
just automatically do).
Perhaps a better name for "lex" would be "index"?
> Support facet.sort=false (index order) with distributed search
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-764
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-764
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Wojtek Piaseczny
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-764.patch, SOLR-764.patch, SOLR-764.patch
>
>
> Distributed search does not currently support sorting facets by index order
> (facet.sort=false).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
