The command shows the data available on both the master and slave servers. However, the actual replication page does not show any replicatable index version.
-- Jeff Newburn Software Engineer, Zappos.com jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562 > From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: <solr-dev@lucene.apache.org> > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:22:38 +0530 > To: <solr-dev@lucene.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Replication page failure :( > > can u hit the master ReplicationHandler with the command details and > see if the info is available? > > or u can just paste it here > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#head-0e25211b6ef50373fcc2f9a6ad403 > 80c169a5397 > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Jeff Newburn <jnewb...@zappos.com> wrote: >> It looks like it fixes the repliation error but the page still does not have >> a Replicatable Index Version. It appears the master no longer sends that >> back to the slave. >> -- >> Jeff Newburn >> Software Engineer, Zappos.com >> jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562 >> >> >>> From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinman...@gmail.com> >>> Reply-To: <solr-dev@lucene.apache.org> >>> Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 01:11:52 +0530 >>> To: <solr-dev@lucene.apache.org> >>> Subject: Re: Replication page failure :( >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Jeff Newburn <jnewb...@zappos.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I was able to nail down what happened. Apparently, the update made a >>>> change >>>> in the xml returned from the master solr for replication. The page blows >>>> up >>>> due to "indexversion" changing to "indexVersion". So unless both master >>>> and >>>> server are at the revision it will blow up with a NPE. This is because >>>> null >>>> is cast to a Long then converted to a long primitive with no exception >>>> handling. (index.jsp like 247) >>> >>> >>> Can you try the SOLR-1050 patch? I think it should fix this problem. >>> >>> >>>> After fixing the issue by upgrading master and slave I have noticed there >>>> is >>>> no Replicatable index version numbers. I looked at the return from the >>>> master and it would appear there is nothing with those variables being >>>> returned. We are currently using trunk as of 03/03/2009. Simple master to >>>> many slaves relationship. >>>> >>> >>> Do you mean that the replicatable index version is not being displayed? Or >>> do you mean that replication is not happening at all? >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >> >> > > > > -- > --Noble Paul
