[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683774#action_12683774
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-705:
--------------------------------------------
bq. Sooooo....what do people think of "meta"? It seems like it could make
things easier on clients - removing the need for correlation-by-id.
I'm +1 on the idea. Let's choose a better name than 'meta' with less likelihood
of collision, say '_meta_'?
> Distributed search should optionally return docID->shard map
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-705
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-705
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Environment: all
> Reporter: Brian Whitman
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-705.patch, SOLR-705.patch, SOLR-705.patch,
> SOLR-705.patch, SOLR-705.patch
>
>
> SOLR-303 queries with &shards parameters set need to return the dociD->shard
> mapping in the response. Without it, updating/deleting documents when the #
> of shards is variable is hard. We currently set this with a special
> requestHandler that filters /update and inserts the shard as a field in the
> index but it would be better if the shard location came back in the query
> response outside of the index.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
