[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12688382#action_12688382
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-1079:
----------------------------------------
I agree with shorter is better... though we should avoid cryptic or misleading.
I think omitTf is misleading. I'd rather we think of something that's maybe
less descriptive (since one will need to look at the docs anyway), but not
misleading (making the person think looking at the docs is not necessary)
maybe omitTerm<something>? "Info"? That would sort of match Lucene's TermInfo
object (which doesn't encompass Payloads, though).
> Rename omitTf to omitTermFreqAndPositions
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1079
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1079
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: documentation, update
> Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> LUCENE-1561 has renamed omitTf.
> See
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/376c1c12dd464164/lucene_1561_and_omittf
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
