This is LUCENE-1573 (properly responding to Thread.interrupt()), which is new in 2.9.
Do you know what would have interrupted the thread in your context? Mike On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote: > thanks! I'm not sure this is related to 2.9, but I have not seen this > before either.... > > 2009-04-24 14:19:53,024 ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore - > java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.InterruptedException: sleep > interrupted > at > org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:620) > at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.read(SegmentInfos.java:289) > at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.init(IndexWriter.java:1456) > at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.<init>(IndexWriter.java:1295) > at > org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter.<init>(SolrIndexWriter.java:159) > at > org.apache.solr.update.UpdateHandler.createMainIndexWriter(UpdateHandler.java:123) > at > org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2.openWriter(DirectUpdateHandler2.java:170) > at > org.apache.solr.update.DirectUpdateHandler2.addDoc(DirectUpdateHandler2.java:217) > at > org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProcessor.processAdd(RunUpdateProcessorFactory.java:60) > at > org.apache.solr.handler.XMLLoader.processUpdate(XMLLoader.java:140) > at org.apache.solr.handler.XMLLoader.load(XMLLoader.java:69) > at > org.apache.solr.handler.ContentStreamHandlerBase.handleRequestBody(ContentStreamHandlerBase.java:54) > at > org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:131) > at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1330) > at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.EmbeddedSolrServer.request(EmbeddedSolrServer.java:139) > at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.request.UpdateRequest.process(UpdateRequest.java:259) > at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServer.add(SolrServer.java:63) > > Any thoughts what could cause that? This is using the embedded solr > server... > > > On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Yes, that would be great! the changes we need are in rev 768275: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=768275 >>> >> >> Done. I upgraded to r768336. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > >
