[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704525#action_12704525
 ] 

Chris Williams commented on SOLR-629:
-------------------------------------

sorry, it was a typo. I was using 0.6 for the fuzziness, not 0.06.

(I have about a week and half experience with solr right now, so bare with me)
Assuming you're right about it being the default behavior, is there any 
alternative way to get it to work? Any fuzzy search with my example above that 
has a stop word in it doesn't return any results.  What kind of field type do 
you run fuzzy search on? Do you basically just run it on a field that has no 
filters on it?

thanks,
Chris

> Fuzzy search with DisMax request handler
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-629
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Guillaume Smet
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: dismax_fuzzy_query_field.v0.1.diff, 
> dismax_fuzzy_query_field.v0.1.diff
>
>
> The DisMax search handler doesn't support fuzzy queries which would be quite 
> useful for our usage of Solr and from what I've seen on the list, it's 
> something several people would like to have.
> Following this discussion 
> http://markmail.org/message/tx6kqr7ga6ponefa#query:solr%20dismax%20fuzzy+page:1+mid:c4pciq6rlr4dwtgm+state:results
>  , I added the ability to add fuzzy query field in the qf parameter. I kept 
> the patch as conservative as possible.
> The syntax supported is: fieldOne^2.3 fieldTwo~0.3 fieldThree~0.2^-0.4 
> fieldFour as discussed in the above thread.
> The recursive query aliasing should work even with fuzzy query fields using a 
> very simple rule: the aliased fields inherit the minSimilarity of their 
> parent, combined with their own one if they have one.
> Only the qf parameter support this syntax atm. I suppose we should make it 
> usable in pf too. Any opinion?
> Comments are very welcome, I'll spend the time needed to put this patch in 
> good shape.
> Thanks.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to