[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12706458#action_12706458
 ] 

Donovan Jimenez commented on SOLR-1091:
---------------------------------------

the character sequence specified seems to be windows 1251 - based on just 
getting it to look like what's in the description in a text editor. 

I see it getting the utf-8 byte length now, but is the output writer guaranteed 
to be outputting in utf-8? sorry if it's a naive question, I do see the 
content-type is text/plain; charset=utf-8 - does that change the output 
writer's encoding?

if it IS guaranteed, then maybe its how the character data is added - i.e. the 
add xml was interpreted utf-8 but the data was actually windows-1251 or similar.

> "phps" (serialized PHP) writer produces invalid output
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1091
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1091
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: search
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>         Environment: Sun JRE 1.6.0 on Centos 5
>            Reporter: frank farmer
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> The serialized PHP output writer can outputs invalid string lengths for 
> certain (unusual) input values.  Specifically, I had a document containing 
> the following 6 byte character sequence: \xED\xAF\x80\xED\xB1\xB8
> I was able to create a document in the index containing this value without 
> issue; however, when fetching the document back out using the serialized PHP 
> writer, it returns a string like the following:
> s:4:"􀁸";
> Note that the string length specified is 4, while the string is actually 6 
> bytes long.
> When using PHP's native serialize() function, it correctly sets the length to 
> 6:
> # php -r 'var_dump(serialize("\xED\xAF\x80\xED\xB1\xB8"));'
> string(13) "s:6:"􀁸";"
> The "wt=php" writer, which produces output to be parsed with eval(), doesn't 
> have any trouble with this string.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to