Hello,

----- Original Message ----
> From: Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>
> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:41:39 PM
> Subject: Re: lucene releases vs trunk
> 
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Chris
> Hostetterwrote:
> > : This proposal was just for the next (1.5?) release cycle though.
> >        ...
> > : I agree though - there is rapid movement in Lucene these days, and things 
> can
> > : be pulled back or altered fairly easily during trunk dev. Sometimes even 
> index
> > : format changing issues - which can be a real pain (having suffered that 
> first
> > : hand in the past). The closer we can stay to actual Lucene releases in
> > : general, the better I think.
> >
> > I suggest we not worry about it too much until the situation arrises.
> 
> I'm calling attention to it because I don't believe the move to
> 2.9-dev was ever discussed on solr-dev.
> AFAIK it was committed as part of SOLR-805... something I missed, and
> I doubt I'm the only one.
> 
> The default should be to use released Lucene versions, and we should
> reluctantly move off of that.
> 
> > Once upon a time the decision to bump the lucene-java rev in Solr was
> > drien largely based on wether we people that that version was had useful
> > additions *and* was relatively "solid".  My impression more recently is
> > that people have been bumping the rev primarily with the
> > features/improvements in mind, and less consideration of the stability
> > probably due to the (completely valid) assumption that solr trunk doesn't
> > *need* to be any more stable then the lucene-java trunk, so we might as
> > well go ahead and rev and help shake things out.
> 
> Right - if we're relatively sure that a Lucene release is imminent
> (and will happen before a Solr release), it's not such a bad idea to
> upgrade.

Aha, so this makes sense.  Stick with the stable version until we see Lucene is 
preparing for a release.  Then upgrade to the latest (nightly) Lucene and catch 
up with the goal of releasing Solr not too long after Lucene has been released.
Like that?

Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch

Reply via email to