[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12733884#action_12733884
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1216:
--------------------------------
bq. I guess changing variable names is fine and I can do it. But if we change
the classnames we lose the history altogether .
are you talking about svn history?
"svn mv" preserves all history ... the only danger is in applying patches
generated by someone else, you have to manually finesse applying the patch to
get the right history bits flipped before committing.
> disambiguate the replication command names
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1216
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1216
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: replication (java)
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Noble Paul
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-1216.patch, SOLR-1216.patch, SOLR-1216.patch
>
>
> There is a lot of confusion in the naming of various commands such as
> snappull, snapshot etc. This is a vestige of the script based replication we
> currently have. The commands can be renamed to make more sense
> * 'snappull' to be renamed to 'sync'
> * 'snapshot' to be renamed to 'backup'
> thoughts?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
