[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734165#action_12734165
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-773:
--------------------------------------
The thing I keep coming back to is Yonik and Ryan's comments that most of this
stuff need not require any custom work at all other than fixing things in Solr
that prevent it from using existing capabilities I'd much rather see work done
there than more work done customizing "spatial" code. At a minimum,
implementing a FunctionQuery for Great Circle distance (and others), adding
sort by function and pseudo-fields, those kinds of things and then maybe
working on Ryan's FieldType ideas. It seems like none of those require custom
components, right?
> Incorporate Local Lucene/Solr
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-773
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: exampleSpatial.zip, lucene-spatial-2.9-dev.jar,
> lucene.tar.gz, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch,
> SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch,
> SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-spatial_solr.patch, SOLR-773.patch,
> SOLR-773.patch, spatial-solr.tar.gz
>
>
> Local Lucene has been donated to the Lucene project. It has some Solr
> components, but we should evaluate how best to incorporate it into Solr.
> See http://lucene.markmail.org/message/orzro22sqdj3wows?q=LocalLucene
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
