On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Grant Ingersoll<[email protected]> wrote: > I always thought that was the thing to do. It was an indication that the > solution has been applied and has proven itself to be correct, versus > resolved just meaning it was applied and the author thought it was taken > care of.
I think that's the distinction that the authors of JIRA meant it to convey... resolved is a developer checking in a patch to solve a problem, and closed is when the original person that hit the bug verifies the fix. It makes more sense in commercial software. For our open source development, I don't think the distinction makes sense and I'd vote for not bothering with "closed". -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
