[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12748986#action_12748986
 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-659:
-----------------------------------

I agree this makes sense to enable efficient bulk operations, and also fits in 
with a past idea I had about mapping shards.param=foo to param=foo during a 
sub-request.

I'll give it a couple of days and commit if there are no objections.

> Explicitly set start and rows per shard for more efficient bulk queries 
> across distributed Solr
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-659
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-659
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: search
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Brian Whitman
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>         Attachments: shards.start_rows.patch, SOLR-659.patch
>
>
> The default behavior of setting start and rows on distributed solr (SOLR-303) 
> is to set start at 0 across all shards and set rows to start+rows across each 
> shard. This ensures all results are returned for any arbitrary start and rows 
> setting, but during "bulk queries" (where start is incrementally increased 
> and rows is kept consistent) the client would need finer control of the 
> per-shard start and rows parameter as retrieving many thousands of documents 
> becomes intractable as start grows higher.
> Attaching a patch that creates a &shards.start and &shards.rows parameter. If 
> used, the logic that sets rows to start+rows per shard is overridden and each 
> shard gets the exact start and rows set in shards.start and shards.rows. The 
> client will receive up to shards.rows * nShards results and should set rows 
> accordingly. This makes bulk queries across distributed solr possible.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to