Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Yonik Seeley
<yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Chris Hostetter
<hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote:
: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0-RC/
I suspect we're going to want to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - particularly
because of LUCENE-1974.
I know I was lobbying for not using non-released versions of Lucene
due to the increase in flux, but I really meant non-bugfix branches.
Seems safe to use an unreleased 2.9.1 branch?
If there are no objections, I'll update to the fixed 2.9.1 branch.
We can figure out whether to wait for 2.9.1 or not later when we know
the schedule.
+1 to update to the fixed 2.9 branch and proceed to release RC.
Koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
