I've been testing with jetty 7.0.0.v20091005, and everything works
good so far..
On Oct 25, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
If all goes well in lucene-land 2.9.1 should start a vote on Monday
sometime...
I've recently tested the latest stable Jetty (6.1.21) ... so we can
avoid some duplication, has anyone tested with the latest tomcat,
resin, or other popular servlet containers?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Yonik Seeley
<yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
OK, so let's do the following: as soon as the Lucene 2.9.1 official
RC
is put up (the one that will be voted on), I'll update Solr and we
can
do our vote at the same time, saving 3 or 4 days... this release has
really been held up long enough :-)
We can re-evaluate what to do if for some reason the Lucene vote
doesn't pass (i.e., we won't blindly release Solr if the lucene vote
fails).
Hopefully everyone has looked at the latest Solr distributions for
any
potential showstoppers that would cause them to vote -1 during the
official vote.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org
> wrote:
Please wait for an official release of Lucene. It makes thing SO
much easier
when you need to dig into the Lucene code.
It is well worth a week delay.
wunder
On Oct 19, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org
>
wrote:
Are we ready for a release?
+1
I don't think we need to wait for Lucene 2.9.1 - we have all the
fixes
in our version, and there's little point in pushing things off yet
another week.
Seems like the next RC should be a *real* one (i.e. no RC label
in the
version, immediately call a VOTE).
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
I got busy at work and haven't been able to
address things as much, but it seems like things are progressing.
Shall I generate another RC or are we waiting for Lucene 2.9.1?
If we go
w/
the 2.9.1-dev, then we just need to restore the Maven stuff for
them.
Hopefully, that stuff was just commented out and not completely
removed
so
as to make it a little easier to restore.
-Grant
