On Oct 28, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Nicholas Letourneau wrote:
Not sure who gets a vote,
Everyone gets to vote -- officially some votes are 'binding' but in
practice this does not really matter.
The more feedback there is, the more confidence we have that things
are good (or need fixed)
and this is my first message to this list, but I
wanted to add that I deployed the maven artifacts (along with the
lucene
2.9.1 ones) to my in house maven repository and successfully built
all my
solr dependant projects with
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.solr</groupId>
<artifactId>solr-core</artifactId>
<version>1.4.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.solr</groupId>
<artifactId>solr-solrj</artifactId>
<version>1.4.0</version>
</dependency>
Everything went swimingly and running "mvn dependency:tree" showed
this
output:
[INFO] +- org.apache.solr:solr-core:jar:1.4.0:compile
[INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-analyzers:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] | | \- org.apache.lucene:lucene-core:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-highlighter:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-queries:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-snowball:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-memory:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-misc:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-spellchecker:jar:2.9.1:compile
[INFO] | +- commons-codec:commons-codec:jar:1.3:compile
[INFO] | +- commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload:jar:1.2.1:compile
[INFO] | +- org.apache.solr:solr-commons-csv:jar:1.4.0:compile
[INFO] | +- woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.7:compile
[INFO] | \-
org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:jar:1.0.1:compile
[INFO] \- org.apache.solr:solr-solrj:jar:1.4.0:compile
[INFO] +- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.5:compile
[INFO] \- org.codehaus.woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.7:compile
[INFO] \- stax:stax-api:jar:1.0.1:compile
Nicholas Letourneau
On 10/27/09 10/27 7:07 PM, "Grant Ingersoll" <gsing...@apache.org>
wrote:
OK, new artifacts are up.
On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: By other issues, I mean the duplicate libs. I think we can live
with them.
I agree ... i would have voted +1 already but i figured based on
your
commit you were in the process of doing a new one.
-Hoss
