That is fine we are using 1.4.0. When I compiled the 1.4.1 was 2k extra in size. -- Jeff Newburn Software Engineer, Zappos.com jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> > Reply-To: <solr-dev@lucene.apache.org> > Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:47:34 -0800 (PST) > To: <solr-dev@lucene.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Solr 1.4.0 vs 1.4.1 > > > : So which would be appropriate? My concern is that the 1.4.1 has a larger > : file size so don't want to miss some 1.4 feature or bug fix that happened > > I don't understand this question ... what do you mean by "1.4.1 has a > larger file size" ? > > building 1.4.0 from the source in the official release should produce the > same jar as what is included in that release -- the only distinction is > the name of the artifacts produced if you don't set the version params on > the command line (i suppose if you build without specifying the version > the artifacts will be slightly bigger because they contain metadata that > includes the (longer) "-dev" version, and the names of the jars included > in the war will have that as well) but the code is still the same. > > > -Hoss >
