On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Actually if it was the case that poly field mapped to a single dynamic > field, then I would agree with you, but as is the discussion, poly field can > map to _many_ dynamic fields, which is where the drift occurs.
I'm not sure if we're using the exact same terminology, but it's well defined how many dynamic fields would be created by the basic point class (exactly one) *if* we decide to go that route and use that option. Can you give an examples of what you mean? Is your objection to this point class registering a single dynamic field, or are you talking about a hypothetical case? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
