[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789879#action_12789879 ]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1298: --------------------------------------- bq. we should also let search components add extra fields to the document. I think we could handle this via the ResponseBuilder by storing an <id, <name, value>> pairing in a map that the ResponseWriter could then consult when it needs it as it's streaming out the results. Tricky part is what to do when there are no ids, I suppose. > FunctionQuery results as pseudo-fields > -------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-1298 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Grant Ingersoll > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.5 > > > It would be helpful if the results of FunctionQueries could be added as > fields to a document. > Couple of options here: > 1. Run FunctionQuery as part of relevance score and add that piece to the > document > 2. Run the function (not really a query) during Document/Field retrieval -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.