On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > On Dec 24, 2009, at 12:42 PM, yo...@apache.org wrote: >> - <fieldType name="location" class="solr.PointType" dimension="2" >> subFieldType="double"/> >> + <fieldType name="location" class="solr.PointType" dimension="2" >> subFieldSuffix="_d"/> >> >> </types> > > Shouldn't we demo both?
There are tradeoffs to including all variations of something (that being schema bloat). These two variants do the exact same thing for the end user (since the only difference is sub-field naming), so we should pick one or the other IMO. That's what most people will end up using. We could include the other variant commented out, but I think that's overkill too given that we listed an example of each in the comment for "location". -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
