[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12799515#action_12799515
 ] 

Brian Westphal commented on SOLR-773:
-------------------------------------

We've got Localsolr (2.9.1 lucene-spatial library) running on Solr 1.4 with 
Tomcat 1.6. Everything's looking good, except for a couple little issues.

Issue #1:
If we specify fl=id (or fl= anything) and wt=json it seems that the fl 
parameter is ignored (thus we get a lot more detail in our results than we'd 
like).

If we specify fl=id and leave out wt=json (which defaults to returning xml 
results), we get the expected fields back. We'd really prefer to use wt=json 
because the results are easier for us to deal with (also, the same issue also 
arises with wt=python and wt=ruby).

Issue #2:
It looks like the defType parameter isn't properly passed through for geo 
queries, making it really hard to use things like dismax + geo.  I've been 
playing with the code a bit and have a "working" patch for it.  However, as I'm 
very new to the solr/localsolr source, I'd be uncomfortable submitting it 
without additional testing.

---------

If anyone knows any workarounds for these issues, please let me know.

> Incorporate Local Lucene/Solr
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-773
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>            Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>         Attachments: exampleSpatial.zip, lucene-spatial-2.9-dev.jar, 
> lucene.tar.gz, screenshot-1.jpg, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, 
> SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, 
> SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, 
> SOLR-773-spatial_solr.patch, SOLR-773.patch, SOLR-773.patch, 
> solrGeoQuery.tar, spatial-solr.tar.gz
>
>
> Local Lucene has been donated to the Lucene project.  It has some Solr 
> components, but we should evaluate how best to incorporate it into Solr.
> See http://lucene.markmail.org/message/orzro22sqdj3wows?q=LocalLucene

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to