[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Steven Rowe updated SOLR-1670:
------------------------------

    Attachment: SOLR-1670.patch

I like Yonik's "overlapping tokens" term better than the term I used in my 
patch ("collocated tokens" - ambiguous, since this is used to refer to phrases 
rather than shared-position tokens), so I've replaced "collocated" with 
"overlapping" in variable names in this version of the patch.

Also, I had forgotten to test for the case where more token stream tokens are 
present at the same position than are expected.  This is now fixed.

I have not made any other changes - in particular, I have not moved the 
overlapping-token-order-insensitive test capability out of BaseTokenTestCase.

All tests pass for me.

> synonymfilter/map repeat bug
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1670
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1670
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Schema and Analysis
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Yonik Seeley
>         Attachments: SOLR-1670.patch, SOLR-1670.patch, SOLR-1670.patch, 
> SOLR-1670_test.patch
>
>
> as part of converting tests for SOLR-1657, I ran into a problem with 
> synonymfilter
> the test for 'repeats' has a flaw, it uses this assertTokEqual construct 
> which does not really validate that two lists of token are equal, it just 
> stops at the shorted one.
> {code}
>     // repeats
>     map.add(strings("a b"), tokens("ab"), orig, merge);
>     map.add(strings("a b"), tokens("ab"), orig, merge);
>     assertTokEqual(getTokList(map,"a b",false), tokens("ab"));
>     /* in reality the result from getTokList is ab ab ab!!!!! */
> {code}
> when converted to assertTokenStreamContents this problem surfaced. attached 
> is an additional assertion to the existing testcase.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to