This may be related to SOLR-1742 and/or SOLR-1743.

I have  a minimal schema file, 4 fields and one copyfield. If UniqueKey
isn't specified in the schema file, going to the admin page produces a
"missing core name in path" error. I can't seem to add documents via Posting
either.

This is with a SOLR downloaded and compiled this morning (Sunday, 14-Feb).
Does anyone have a clue about this or am I seeing things?

Same thing happens with the 1.4 release.

The *only* difference between success and failure is removing (or not)
<UniqueKey>. Yet we state that the unique key isn't required at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#The_Unique_Key_Field. And specifying
required="false" doesn't seem to change things.

To try to get this to a minimal set of things to look at, I deleted my index
directory completely and saw the above, before indexing anything. If I leave
UniqueKey in, the admin page shows up fine.

Even with required="false" (both for field and UniqueKey), indexing a
document via post fails with "...Status 400 - Document is missing uniqueKey
field id</h1><HR size="1" noshade="noshade"><p><b>type</b> Status
report</p><p><b>message</b>"

Running under Tomcat on a Mac if it matters, Java 1.6

Erick

Here's the (I believe) relevant portion of my schema file...

<fields>

   <field name="title" type="text" indexed="true" stored="true"
required="true" />
   <field name="body" type="text" indexed="true" stored="true"
required="true" />
   <field name="author" type="text" indexed="true" stored="true"
required="true" />
   <field name="title_sort" type="alphaOnlySort" indexed="true"
stored="true" required="true" />
   <field name="id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true"
required="false"/>

</fields>

 <uniqueKey required="false">id</uniqueKey>

 <!-- field for the QueryParser to use when an explicit fieldname is absent
-->
 <defaultSearchField>body</defaultSearchField>

 <!-- SolrQueryParser configuration: defaultOperator="AND|OR" -->
 <solrQueryParser defaultOperator="OR"/>

 <copyField source="title" dest="title_sort"/>

Reply via email to