[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12837035#action_12837035
 ] 

Chris Harris commented on SOLR-380:
-----------------------------------

This is an interesting patch. One current limitation seems to be that proximity 
search queries (PhraseQueries and SpanQueries) may result in false positives. 
For example, if I query

bq. "audit trail"~10

then I think I'd expect Solr to return only the page #s where audit and trail 
are near one another. (Yes, what I just said leaves some wiggle room for 
implementation details.) The current code, in contrast, looks like it will 
report all the pages where "audit" and "trail" occur, regardless of proximity 
to the other term.

Has anyone thought about how to add proximity awareness?

> There's no way to convert search results into page-level hits of a 
> "structured document".
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-380
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-380
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: search
>            Reporter: Tricia Williams
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-380-XmlPayload.patch, SOLR-380-XmlPayload.patch, 
> xmlpayload-example.zip, xmlpayload-src.jar, xmlpayload.jar
>
>
> "Paged-Text" FieldType for Solr
> A chance to dig into the guts of Solr. The problem: If we index a monograph 
> in Solr, there's no way to convert search results into page-level hits. The 
> solution: have a "paged-text" fieldtype which keeps track of page divisions 
> as it indexes, and reports page-level hits in the search results.
> The input would contain page milestones: <page id="234"/>. As Solr processed 
> the tokens (using its standard tokenizers and filters), it would concurrently 
> build a structural map of the item, indicating which term position marked the 
> beginning of which page: <page id="234" firstterm="14324"/>. This map would 
> be stored in an unindexed field in some efficient format.
> At search time, Solr would retrieve term positions for all hits that are 
> returned in the current request, and use the stored map to determine page ids 
> for each term position. The results would imitate the results for 
> highlighting, something like:
> <lst name="pages">
> &nbsp;&nbsp;<lst name="doc1">
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;                <int name="pageid">234</int>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;                <int name="pageid">236</int>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;        </lst>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;        <lst name="doc2">
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;                <int name="pageid">19</int>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;        </lst>
> </lst>
> <lst name="hitpos">
> &nbsp;&nbsp;        <lst name="doc1">
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;                <lst name="234">
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;                        <int 
> name="pos">14325</int>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;                </lst>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;        </lst>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;        ...
> </lst>

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to