[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1776:
---------------------------
Description: the DismaxQParser (and ExtendedDismaxQParser) is completely
useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of
any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as
teh default value for hte qf param. (was: the DismaxQParser is completely
useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of
any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as
teh default value for hte qf param.)
Summary: dismax and edismax should treate schema's default field as a
default qf (was: dismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf)
> dismax and edismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1776
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Assignee: Hoss Man
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> the DismaxQParser (and ExtendedDismaxQParser) is completely useless w/o
> specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good
> reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh
> default value for hte qf param.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
