On 2/6/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 5, 2007, at 11:50 PM, Mel Riffe wrote:
> I have a first pass at getting the test server to come up in a win32
> environment.
Fantastic! Now both of you will soon be able to test solrb on
Windows ;)
> So I would like to know how to submit a patch.
Pleasantly enough, we have this: <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/
HowToContribute>
Thanks! Hopefully tonight...
For solrb, patches rooted from the solrb directory are cleaner for me.
> 1) Failure:
> test_bad_connection(ServerTest) [./test/functional/server_test.rb:78]:
> <Errno::ECONNREFUSED> exception expected but was
> Class: <Errno::EBADF>
> Message: <"Bad file descriptor - connect(2)">
This test has been brittle, I believe. We can adjust it to be more
lenient and simply assert we get an exception thrown. This test in
particular is not really testing much of importance, since pointing
solrb to a bad Solr URL is gonna be bad news no matter what. But
making the exception it checks for more lenient should be fine.
> 2) Failure:
> test_ping(ServerTest) [./test/functional/server_test.rb:96]:
> <true> expected but was
> <false>.
hmmm... odd. I don't have an explanation for this one. What is the
ping request returning? Fire up Solr and hit /admin/ping to see
what is returned.
Can do!
Thanks for your effort on this. Despite my joke above, Windows
support is important.
Actually there are three Windows users: Me, Myself and I. ;-)
Cheers, Mel
Erik
