if use customer Analyzer,,,,,
u can use solr admin gui, and click analyzer which can help you use customer
analyzer(i use it to be sure my customer analyzer is ok).
if u wanna know query syntax ,,,it same with lucene,,so u can read
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/queryparsersyntax.html
2007/4/26, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What it probably boils down to is how you analyzed (or didn't) those
fields.
What is your schema for those fields?
Erik
On Apr 25, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Michael Kimsal wrote:
> leading and trailing at the same time don't work. :( This is
> supposedly
> fixed in a lucene nightly, but I can't get solr and lucene trunks
> to compile
> together. Also, I wouldn't be able to convince anyone here to run
> nightly
> trunks in production. :)
>
>
>
> On 4/25/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Enable leading wildcards and try this:
>>
>> type:changelog AND filename:*angel*
>>
>> wunder
>>
>> On 4/25/07 1:34 PM, "Michael Kimsal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks. I'm still no results with your suggestion though. I
>> also tried
>> >
>> > type:+changelog AND ( (filename:angel) OR (filename:angel*) OR
>> > (filename:*angel) )
>> >
>> > but am getting parse errors. :(
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4/25/07, Cody Caughlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> What about:
>> >>
>> >> (type:changelog) AND (filename:angel)
>> >>
>> >> Or if you do the 3 different type of filename queries, use
>> parenthesis
>> >> to properly break them up, e..g
>> >>
>> >> type:changelog AND (filename:... OR filename:... OR filename:...)
>> >>
>> >> I dont know enough about how Lucene's precedence rules, but you
>> might
>> >> have better luck with this kind of grouping.
>> >>
>> >> /cody
>> >>
>> >> On 4/25/07, Michael Kimsal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>> Hello all:
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm trying to find a record in my index where the 'type' is
>> changelog
>> >> and
>> >>> the 'filename' has 'angel' in it.
>> >>>
>> >>> Expressing this as
>> >>> type:changelog filename:+angel or filename:+angel* or filename:
>> +*angel
>> >>>
>> >>> throws a parse error (probably understandably)
>> >>>
>> >>> type:changelog (filename:+angel or filename:+angel* or
>> filename:+*angel)
>> >>> doesn't seem to work either.
>> >>>
>> >>> I've tried this a number of ways and I either get a parse
>> error or
>> >>> *everything* is returned - I only want
>> >>> records where the type is 'changelog' and the filename has
>> 'angel' in
>> >> it.
>> >>> How would this be expressed?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Michael Kimsal
>> >>> http://webdevradio.com
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Michael Kimsal
> http://webdevradio.com
--
regards
jl
