: Do you mean something like below ? : <field name="autocomplete">w wo wor word</field>
yeah, but there are some Tokenizers that make this trivial (EdgeNGramTokenizer i think is the name) : project, definitively not a good practice for portability of indexes. A : duplicate field with an analyser to produce a sortable ASCII version : would be better. exactly ... I think conceptually the methodology for solving the problem is very similar to the way the SpellChecker contrib works: use a very custom index designed for the application (not just look at the terms in the main corpus) and custom logic for using that index. -Hoss
