This caused me a certain amount of trouble, because the parser errors with ill-formed queries. Try these:
foo - TO HAVE AND HAVE NOT wunder On 8/1/07 12:47 AM, "Chris Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : > StandardRequestHandler), but I also want to be able to use Lucene's > : > boolean syntax (AND/OR/NOT). This doesn't seem to be supported by > : > DisMaxRequestHandler. I will need to copy or extend > > for the record, using the Lucene boolean options "+" and "-" do work in > the "q" expression for the dismax handler ... for that matter, the boolean > keywords AND, OR, and NOT work as well (allthough i never intended them > to. funny story: when i was writing dismax, i assumed i needed to do > something to prevent AND/OR/NOT from working, after writing most of it i > went to test it and discovered they didn't work and figured something else > i was doing in my QUeryParser subclass was alrady taking care of it and > moved on to deal with other problems --- it wasn't until months later that > i realized i was an idiot and was typing "and" but the QueryParser only > recognizes the uppercase versions) > > The only part of the "boolean" syntax that doesn't work is compelx boolean > expressions using parens. > > > > > > -Hoss >
