On 8/15/07, Jonathan Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to understand how best to integrate directly with Solr > (Java-to-Java in the same JVM) to make the most of its query optimisation - > chiefly, its caching of queries which merely filter rather than rank > results. > > I notice that SolrIndexSearcher maintains a filter cache and so does > LuceneQueryOptimiser. Shouldn't they be contributing to/using the same > cache, or are they used for different things?
LuceneQueryOptimiser is no longer used since one can directly specify filters via fq parameters. -Yonik