That's the latest. I was experimenting with caching, which might be the
problem.
I'll have a look, could you give me an idea of how large the radius was
and how many results were coming back.
Thanks
P
Sandeep Shetty wrote:
Hi, i'm using local lucene, downloaded the latest zip file
solr-example_s1.3_ls0.2.tgz
is there a newer version available?
Thanks!
Sandeep
-----Original Message-----
From: patrick o'leary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 September 2007 16:08
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: locallucene former custom-sort thread
Changing thread name;
Are you using local lucene or local solr, and which version?
P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have been testing locallucene with our data for the last couple of days.
one issue i faced with it is during when using geo sorting is that it
seems
to eat up all the memory, however big and become progressively slower,
finally after several requests (10 or so in my case) it throws up a
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space error.
is there a way to get around this?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 September 2007 15:48
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: custom sorting
Is the machinery in place to do this now (hook up a function query to
be used in sorting)?
I'm trying to figure out what's the best way to do a distance sort:
custom comparator or function query.
Using a custom comparator seems straightforward and reusable across
both the standard and dismax handlers. But it also seems most likely
to impact performance (or at least require the most work/knowledge to
get right by minimizing calculations, caching, watching out for memory
leaks, etc.). (Speaking of which, could anyone with more Lucene/Solr
experience than I comment on the performance characteristics of the
locallucene implementation mentioned on the list recently? I've taken
a first look and it seems reasonable to me.)
Using a function query, as Yonik suggests above, is another approach.
But to get a true sort, you have to boost the original query to zero?
How does this impact the results returned by the original query? Will
the requirements (and boosts) of the original (now nested) query
remain intact, only sorted by the function? Also, is there any way to
do this with the dismax handler?
Thanks,
- Jon
On 9/27/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/27/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using something like this, how would the custom SortComparatorSource
get a parameter from the request to use in sorting calculations?
perhaps hook in via function query:
dist(10.4,20.2,geoloc)
And either manipulate the score with that and sort by score,
q=+(foo bar)0 dist(10.4,20.2,geoloc)
sort=score asc
or extend solr's sorting mechanisms to allow specifying a function to
sort
by.
sort="dist(10.4,20.2,geoloc) asc"
-Yonik
This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning +44 (0)20
7452 5300 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]. You should not copy it or use
it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Touch
Local cannot accept liability for statements made which are clearly the
sender's own and are not made on behalf of the firm.
Touch Local Limited
Registered Number: 2885607
VAT Number: GB896112114
Cardinal Tower, 12 Farringdon Road, London EC1M 3NN
+44 (0)20 7452 5300
--
Patrick O'Leary
AOL Local Search Technologies
Phone: + 1 703 265 8763
You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles.
Do you understand this?
And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat.
- Albert Einstein
 View
Patrick O Leary's profile
|
