On 10/29/07, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 10:48 -0400, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > On 10/25/07, Max Scheffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is it possible that the prefix-processing ignores the filters? > > > > Yes, It's a known limitation that we haven't worked out a fix for yet. > > The issue is that you can't just run the prefix through the filters > > because of things like stop words, stemming, minimum length filters, > > etc. > > What about not having only "facet.prefix" but additionally > "facet.filtered.prefix" that runs the prefix through the filters? > Would that be possible?
The underlying issue remains - it's not safe to treat the prefix like any other word when running it through the filters. -Yonik
