No both are same for me With Regards Aman Tandon
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Right, but the blank field and missing field are different things. Are > they for you? If yes, then correct, you are stuck with getting them > back. But if "" blank field is the same as missing/empty field, then > you can pre-process unify them. > > Regards, > Alex. > Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ > Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr > proficiency > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > @Alex, yes we need them to indexed and stored, as we are doing some > > processing if fields are blank. > > > > @Gora Thanks, i will try this one. > > > > Thanks for your quick replies. > > > > With Regards > > Aman Tandon > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Gora Mohanty <g...@mimirtech.com> wrote: > > > >> On 8 July 2014 15:46, Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Is this possible to not to count the facets for the blank values? > >> > e.g. cat: > >> [...] > >> > >> Either filter them out in the query, or remove them client-side when > >> displaying the results. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Gora > >> >
