no it does not. Here the intent, I think, is not to duplicate stored info, as other metadata fields like author, keywords etc already are stored, if 'text' was stored (text is where all fields: content, author etc are copyed), then it would contain some duplicate info.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a question, does storing the data in copyfields save space? > > With Regards > Aman Tandon > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM, jmlucjav <jmluc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ok, I had not noticed text contains also the other metadata like > keywords, > > description etc, nevermind! > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:28 AM, jmlucjav <jmluc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > In the sample schema.xml I can see this: > > > > > > <!-- Main body of document extracted by SolrCell. > > > NOTE: This field is not indexed by default, since it is > also > > > copied to "text" > > > using copyField below. This is to save space. Use this > field > > > for returning and > > > highlighting document content. Use the "text" field to > search > > > the content. --> > > > <field name="content" type="text_general" indexed="false" > > > stored="true" multiValued="true"/> > > > > > > > > > I am wondering, how does having this split in two fields text/content > > save > > > space? > > > > > >
