Sorry, analysis page clip is getting trimmed off and hence the indention is
lost.

Here it is :

ridemakers | ride | ridemakerz | ride | ridemark | ride | makers | makerz|
care

expected:

ridemakers | ride | ridemakerz | ride | ridemark | ride | makers |
makerz| *ride
care*



On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:21 PM, David Philip <davidphilipshe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> contd..
>
> expectation was that the "ride care"  should not have split into two
> tokens.
>
> It should have been as below. Please correct me/point me where I am wrong.
>
>
> Input : ridemakers, ride makers, ridemakerz, ride makerz, ride\mark, ride\
> care
>
> o/p
>
> ridemakersrideridemakerzrideridemarkridemakersmakerz
>
> *ride care*
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:16 PM, David Philip <davidphilipshe...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>    I remember using multi-words in synonyms in Solr 3.x version. In case
>> of multi words, I was escaping space with back slash[\] and it work as
>> intended.  Ex: ride\ makers, riders, rider\ guards.  Each one mapped to
>> each other and so when I searched for ride makers, I obtained the search
>> results for all of them. The field type was same as below. I have same set
>> up in solr 4.10 but now the multi word space escape is getting ignored. It
>> is tokenizing on spaces.
>>
>>  synonyms.txt
>>     ridemakers, ride makers, ridemakerz, ride makerz, ride\mark, ride\
>> care
>>
>>
>> Analysis page:
>>
>> ridemakersrideridemakerzrideridemarkridemakersmakerzcare
>>
>> Field Type
>>
>>     <fieldType name="text_syn" class="solr.TextField"
>> positionIncrementGap="100">
>>       <analyzer>
>>         <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
>>         <filter class="solr.SynonymFilterFactory" synonyms="synonyms.txt"
>> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
>>       </analyzer>
>>     </fieldType>
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you please tell me what could be the issue? How do I handle
>> multi-word cases?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     synonyms.txt
>>     ridemakers, ride makers, ridemakerz, ride makerz, ride\mark, ride\
>> care
>>
>>
>> Thanks - David
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to