It should help to weight the terms with their frequency in the
original document. That will distinguish between two documents
with the same terms, but different focus.

wunder

On 4/22/08 7:46 AM, "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> No, the MLT feature does not have that kind of field-specific
> boosting capability.  It sounds like it could be a useful enhancement
> though.  Of course you do get boosts for "interesting terms" already,
> but maybe having an additional field-specific boost would be a nice
> touch too.
> 
> Erik
> 
> On Apr 22, 2008, at 9:13 AM, Francisco Sanmartin wrote:
>> I know that only one query of that type does not change anything.
>> But when it's two or more with different boosts, i hope it does.
>> Here is the situation:
>> My docs have "Title" and "Description". What I want to do is to
>> give more relevancy to the morelikethis on the title than on the
>> description. So the query would be like this:
>> 
>> query = (words^0.4 in^0.3 the^0.56 title^0.65)^0.70 (words^0.7
>> in^0.33 the^0.49 description^0.43)^0.30
>> 
>> This way, the words in the title are more relevant than the words
>> in the description, right?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Pako
>> 
>> 
>> Erik Hatcher wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Apr 21, 2008, at 5:02 PM, Francisco Sanmartin wrote:
>>>> Is it possible to boost the query that MoreLikeThis returns
>>>> before sending it to Solr? I mean, technically is possible,
>>>> because you can add a factor to the whole query but...does it
>>>> make sense? (Remember that MoreLikeThis can already boosts each
>>>> term inside the query).
>>>> 
>>>> For example, this could be a result of MoreLikeThis (with native
>>>> boosting enabled)
>>>> 
>>>> queryResultMLT = (this^0.4 is^0.5 a^0.6 query^0.33 of^0.29
>>>> morelikethis^0.67)
>>>> 
>>>> what I want to do is
>>>> 
>>>> queryResulltMLT = (this^0.4 is^0.5 a^0.6 query^0.33 of^0.29
>>>> morelikethis^0.67)^0.60      <---(notice the boost of 0.60 for
>>>> the whole query)
>>> 
>>> That last boost wouldn't change the doc ordering at all, so it'd
>>> be kinda useless.
>>> 
>>> What are you trying to accomplish?
>>> 
>>>     Erik
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to