I had a similar issue, which was caused by 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6763.  Are you getting long GC 
pauses or similar before the leader mismatches occur?

Alan Woodward
www.flax.co.uk


On 7 Jan 2015, at 10:01, Thomas Lamy wrote:

> Hi there,
> 
> we are running a 3 server cloud serving a dozen 
> single-shard/replicate-everywhere collections. The 2 biggest collections are 
> ~15M docs, and about 13GiB / 2.5GiB size. Solr is 4.10.2, ZK 3.4.5, Tomcat 
> 7.0.56, Oracle Java 1.7.0_72-b14
> 
> 10 of the 12 collections (the small ones) get filled by DIH full-import once 
> a day starting at 1am. The second biggest collection is updated usind DIH 
> delta-import every 10 minutes, the biggest one gets bulk json updates with 
> commits once in 5 minutes.
> 
> On a regular basis, we have a leader information mismatch:
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor; Request says it 
> is coming from leader, but we are the leader
> or the opposite
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor; ClusterState 
> says we are the leader, but locally we don't think so
> 
> One of these pop up once a day at around 8am, making either some cores going 
> to "recovery failed" state, or all cores of at least one cloud node into 
> state "gone".
> This started out of the blue about 2 weeks ago, without changes to neither 
> software, data, or client behaviour.
> 
> Most of the time, we get things going again by restarting solr on the current 
> leader node, forcing a new election - can this be triggered while keeping 
> solr (and the caches) up?
> But sometimes this doesn't help, we had an incident last weekend where our 
> admins didn't restart in time, creating millions of entries in 
> /solr/oversser/queue, making zk close the connection, and leader re-elect 
> fails. I had to flush zk, and re-upload collection config to get solr up 
> again (just like in https://gist.github.com/isoboroff/424fcdf63fa760c1d1a7).
> 
> We have a much bigger cloud (7 servers, ~50GiB Data in 8 collections, 1500 
> requests/s) up and running, which does not have these problems since 
> upgrading to 4.10.2.
> 
> 
> Any hints on where to look for a solution?
> 
> Kind regards
> Thomas
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Lamy
> Cytainment AG & Co KG
> Nordkanalstrasse 52
> 20097 Hamburg
> 
> Tel.:     +49 (40) 23 706-747
> Fax:     +49 (40) 23 706-139
> Sitz und Registergericht Hamburg
> HRA 98121
> HRB 86068
> Ust-ID: DE213009476
> 

Reply via email to