Thank you, James, I'll do that. ResponseBuilder carries around with it the QParser, Query, and query string, so getting suggestions from parsed query terms shouldn't be a big deal. What looks to be hard is rewriting the original query with the suggestions. That's probably why the regex is used instead of the parser.
-Scott On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Dyer, James <james.d...@ingramcontent.com> wrote: > Having worked with the spellchecking code for the last few years, I've > often wondered the same thing, but I never looked seriously into it. I'm > sure there's probably some serious hurdles, hence the Query Converter. The > easy thing to do here is to use "spellcheck.q", and then pass in > space-delimited keywords. This bypasses the query converter entirely for > custom situations like yours. > > But please, if you find a way to plug the actual query parser into > spellcheck, consider opening a jira & contributing the code, even if what > you end up with isn't in a final polished state for general use. > > James Dyer > Ingram Content Group > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Stults [mailto:sstu...@opensourceconnections.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 11:26 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: SpellingQueryConverter and query parsing > > Hello! > > SpellingQueryConverter "parses" the incoming query in sort of a quick and > dirty way with a regular expression. Is there a reason the query string > isn't parsed with the _actual_ parser, if one was configured for that type > of request? Even better, could the parsed query object be added to the > response in some way so that the query wouldn't need to be parsed twice? > The individual terms could then be visited and substituted in-place without > needing to worry about preserving the meaning of operators in the query. > > The motive in my question is, I may need to implement a QueryConverter > because I'm using a custom parser, and using that parser in the > QueryConverter itself seems like the right thing to do. That wasn't done > though in SpellingQueryConverter, so I wan't to find out why before I go > blundering into a known minefield. > > > Thanks! > -Scott > -- Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.409.2780 http://www.opensourceconnections.com
